On Sat, 21 Aug 2021 at 23:13, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away. > > The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below. > It has been compile tested. > > No memory allocation in involved in this patch, so no GFP_ tweak is needed. > > @@ @@ > - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL > > @@ @@ > - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE > + DMA_TO_DEVICE > > @@ @@ > - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE > + DMA_FROM_DEVICE > > @@ @@ > - PCI_DMA_NONE > + DMA_NONE > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3; > @@ > - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) > + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3; > @@ > - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3) > + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5; > @@ > - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5) > + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2, e3, e4; > @@ > - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4) > + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4) > > @@ > expression e1, e2; > @@ > - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2) > + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2) > > @@ > expression e1, e2; > @@ > - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2) > + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2) > > @@ > expression e1, e2; > @@ > - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2) > + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2) > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied for next, thanks! Kind regards Uffe > --- > If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML: > https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4 > --- > drivers/memstick/host/r592.c | 5 ++--- > drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c | 12 ++++++------ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c b/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c > index 615a83782e55..7ed984360349 100644 > --- a/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c > +++ b/drivers/memstick/host/r592.c > @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int r592_transfer_fifo_dma(struct r592_device *dev) > > /* TODO: hidden assumption about nenth beeing always 1 */ > sg_count = dma_map_sg(&dev->pci_dev->dev, &dev->req->sg, 1, is_write ? > - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE : PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); > + DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE); > > if (sg_count != 1 || sg_dma_len(&dev->req->sg) < R592_LFIFO_SIZE) { > message("problem in dma_map_sg"); > @@ -310,8 +310,7 @@ static int r592_transfer_fifo_dma(struct r592_device *dev) > } > > dma_unmap_sg(&dev->pci_dev->dev, &dev->req->sg, 1, is_write ? > - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE : PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); > - > + DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE); > > return dev->dma_error; > } > diff --git a/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c b/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c > index 57145374f6ac..c272453670be 100644 > --- a/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c > +++ b/drivers/memstick/host/tifm_ms.c > @@ -279,8 +279,8 @@ static int tifm_ms_issue_cmd(struct tifm_ms *host) > if (host->use_dma) { > if (1 != tifm_map_sg(sock, &host->req->sg, 1, > host->req->data_dir == READ > - ? PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE > - : PCI_DMA_TODEVICE)) { > + ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE > + : DMA_TO_DEVICE)) { > host->req->error = -ENOMEM; > return host->req->error; > } > @@ -350,8 +350,8 @@ static void tifm_ms_complete_cmd(struct tifm_ms *host) > if (host->use_dma) { > tifm_unmap_sg(sock, &host->req->sg, 1, > host->req->data_dir == READ > - ? PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE > - : PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); > + ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE > + : DMA_TO_DEVICE); > } > > writel((~TIFM_CTRL_LED) & readl(sock->addr + SOCK_CONTROL), > @@ -607,8 +607,8 @@ static void tifm_ms_remove(struct tifm_dev *sock) > if (host->use_dma) > tifm_unmap_sg(sock, &host->req->sg, 1, > host->req->data_dir == READ > - ? PCI_DMA_TODEVICE > - : PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); > + ? DMA_TO_DEVICE > + : DMA_FROM_DEVICE); > host->req->error = -ETIME; > > do { > -- > 2.30.2 >
