On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 12:18:36 +0200 Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Steven, Hi Lukas, thanks for the report. > Did you intend to depend on the existing "HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS" here? > > Or did you intend to add a new config DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS > analogously to DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS as defined in > ./kernel/trace/Kconfig (see below)? > > config DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS > def_bool y > depends on DYNAMIC_FTRACE > depends on HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS > > I am happy to provide a patch, once I understand what was intended here. > Yeah, that looks to be the missing part. The HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS is just showing support, but knowing it is enabled would require DYNAMIC_FTRACE being set (which is user enabled). Feel free to send a patch, and mark it for stable. -- Steve
