[PATCH][next] net: pcs: xpcs: Fix a less than zero u16 comparision error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Currently the check for the u16 variable val being less than zero is
always false because val is unsigned. Fix this by using the int
variable for the assignment and less than zero check.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Fixes: f7380bba42fd ("net: pcs: xpcs: add support for NXP SJA1110")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs-nxp.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs-nxp.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs-nxp.c
index de99c37cf2ae..80430ca94fbf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs-nxp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs-nxp.c
@@ -152,11 +152,11 @@ static int nxp_sja1110_pma_config(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
 	/* Enable TX and RX PLLs and circuits.
 	 * Release reset of PMA to enable data flow to/from PCS.
 	 */
-	val = xpcs_read(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, SJA1110_POWERDOWN_ENABLE);
-	if (val < 0)
-		return val;
+	ret = xpcs_read(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, SJA1110_POWERDOWN_ENABLE);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 
-	val &= ~(SJA1110_TXPLL_PD | SJA1110_TXPD | SJA1110_RXCH_PD |
+	val = ret & ~(SJA1110_TXPLL_PD | SJA1110_TXPD | SJA1110_RXCH_PD |
 		 SJA1110_RXBIAS_PD | SJA1110_RESET_SER_EN |
 		 SJA1110_RESET_SER | SJA1110_RESET_DES);
 	val |= SJA1110_RXPKDETEN | SJA1110_RCVEN;
-- 
2.31.1




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux