On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:23:58AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 06:43:53PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The return code variable rc is being set to return error values in two
> > places in sja1105_mdiobus_base_tx_register and yet it is not being
> > returned, the function always returns 0 instead. Fix this by replacing
> > the return 0 with the return code rc.
> >
> > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> > Fixes: 5a8f09748ee7 ("net: dsa: sja1105: register the MDIO buses for 100base-T1 and 100base-TX")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_mdio.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_mdio.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_mdio.c
> > index 8dfd06318b23..08517c70cb48 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_mdio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_mdio.c
> > @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int sja1105_mdiobus_base_tx_register(struct sja1105_private *priv,
> > out_put_np:
> > of_node_put(np);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return rc;
>
> Should this function really return success if of_device_is_available()?
If _not_ of_device_is_available you mean? Yup. Nothing wrong with not
having an internal MDIO bus. This is a driver which supports switches
that do and switches that don't, and even if the node exists, it may
have status = "disabled", which is again fine.
Or am I misunderstanding the question?
