Hi Colin,
Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 27 May 2021
15:50:48 +0100:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Currently there are corner cases where spec_times is NULL and
> chip->parameters.onfi or when best_mode is zero where ret is
^
something is missing here, the sentence is not clear
> not assigned a value and an uninitialized return value can be
> returned. Fix this by ensuring ret is initialized to -EINVAL.
I don't see how this situation can happen.
In both cases, no matter the value of best_mode, the for loop will
always execute at least one time (mode 0) so ret will be populated.
Maybe the robot does not know that best_mode cannot be negative and
should be defined unsigned, but the current patch is invalid.
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
> Fixes: 9d3194bf2aef ("mtd: rawnand: Allow SDR timings to be nacked")
> Fixes: a9ecc8c814e9 ("mtd: rawnand: Choose the best timings, NV-DDR included")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> index 57a583149cc0..18db742f650c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ int nand_choose_best_sdr_timings(struct nand_chip *chip,
> struct nand_sdr_timings *spec_timings)
> {
> const struct nand_controller_ops *ops = chip->controller->ops;
> - int best_mode = 0, mode, ret;
> + int best_mode = 0, mode, ret = -EINVAL;
>
> iface->type = NAND_SDR_IFACE;
>
> @@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ int nand_choose_best_nvddr_timings(struct nand_chip *chip,
> struct nand_nvddr_timings *spec_timings)
> {
> const struct nand_controller_ops *ops = chip->controller->ops;
> - int best_mode = 0, mode, ret;
> + int best_mode = 0, mode, ret = 0;
>
> iface->type = NAND_NVDDR_IFACE;
>
Thanks,
Miquèl
