Hi,
Thanks for the patch.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 01 May 2021 04:55 PM
> To: mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx; Michal Simek
> <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; quanyang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rajan Vaja
> <RAJANV@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jolly Shah <JOLLYS@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tejas Patel
> <tejasp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhraj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Christophe JAILLET
> <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] clk: zynqmp: pll: Remove some dead code
>
> 'clk_hw_set_rate_range()' does not return any error code and 'ret' is
> known to be 0 at this point, so this message can never be displayed.
>
> Remove it.
>
> Fixes: 3fde0e16d016 ("drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> HOWEVER, the message is about 'clk_set_rate_range()', not
> 'clk_hw_set_rate_range()'. So the message is maybe correct and the
> 'xxx_rate_range()' function incorrect.
> ---
> drivers/clk/zynqmp/pll.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/zynqmp/pll.c b/drivers/clk/zynqmp/pll.c
> index abe6afbf3407..af11e9400058 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/zynqmp/pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/zynqmp/pll.c
> @@ -331,8 +331,6 @@ struct clk_hw *zynqmp_clk_register_pll(const char *name,
> u32 clk_id,
> }
>
> clk_hw_set_rate_range(hw, PS_PLL_VCO_MIN, PS_PLL_VCO_MAX);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - pr_err("%s:ERROR clk_set_rate_range failed %d\n", name, ret);
[Rajan] Instead of removing, can we get return value of clk_hw_set_rate_range() and
print in case of an error.
>
> return hw;
> }
> --
> 2.30.2
