On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:01:36PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 22/04/2021 13:56, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> >> On 22/04/2021 13:52, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 01:11:15PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> >>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> Several variables are being assigned with values that are never
> >>>> read and being updated later with a new value. The initializations
> >>>> are redundant and can be removed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/tty/serial/jsm/jsm_cls.c | 6 ++----
> >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/jsm/jsm_cls.c b/drivers/tty/serial/jsm/jsm_cls.c
> >>>> index b507a2cec926..b58ea4344aaf 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/jsm/jsm_cls.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/jsm/jsm_cls.c
> >>>> @@ -349,8 +349,8 @@ static void cls_assert_modem_signals(struct jsm_channel *ch)
> >>>>
> >>>> static void cls_copy_data_from_uart_to_queue(struct jsm_channel *ch)
> >>>> {
> >>>> - int qleft = 0;
> >>>> - u8 linestatus = 0;
> >>>> + int qleft;
> >>>> + u8 linestatus;
> >>>> u8 error_mask = 0;
> >>>> u16 head;
> >>>> u16 tail;
> >>>> @@ -365,8 +365,6 @@ static void cls_copy_data_from_uart_to_queue(struct jsm_channel *ch)
> >>>> head = ch->ch_r_head & RQUEUEMASK;
> >>>> tail = ch->ch_r_tail & RQUEUEMASK;
> >>>>
> >>>> - /* Get our cached LSR */
> >>>> - linestatus = ch->ch_cached_lsr;
> >>>> ch->ch_cached_lsr = 0;
> >>>
> >>> Why leave this assignment in? Looks like this was all copy-pasta, but
> >>> this assignment makes even less sense now that you remove the comment
> >>> and load.
> >>
> >> Which assignment are you referring to?
> >
> > The one just above my comment:
> >
> > ch->ch_cached_lsr = 0;
>
> that cached value is being used in jsm_neo.c, so removing the zero'ing
> may cause some issues.
That's for you to determine, right? Only doing half of a clean may
actually be worse than doing nothing at all. At least now it's somewhat
clear why that statement is there.
The jsm_neo.c implements support for a different class of devices and
only those actually use ch_cached_lsr AFAICT.
It would be good if you include some context in the commit message such
as which commit added this code and that it has never been used.
Johan
