On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:25 AM Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The for-loop iterates with a u8 loop counter i and compares this > with the loop upper limit of num_parents that is an int type. > There is a potential infinite loop if num_parents is larger than > the u8 loop counter. Fix this by making the loop counter the same > type as num_parents. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Infinite loop") > Fixes: 734d82f4a678 ("clk: uniphier: add core support code for UniPhier clock driver") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier-mux.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier-mux.c b/drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier-mux.c > index 462c84321b2d..ce219e0d2a85 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier-mux.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/uniphier/clk-uniphier-mux.c > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static u8 uniphier_clk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw) > int num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw); > int ret; > unsigned int val; > - u8 i; > + int i; > > ret = regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->reg, &val); > if (ret) > -- > 2.30.2 > clk_hw_get_num_parents() returns 'unsigned int', so I think 'num_parents' should also have been 'unsigned int'. Maybe, the loop counter 'i' also should be 'unsigned int' then? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada