On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:33:12AM +0200, Sergei Krainov wrote:
> Remove unused variable from rtl871x_mlme.c.
>
> No side effects can be seen locally or in r8712_find_network()
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Krainov <sergei.krainov.lkd@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_mlme.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_mlme.c
> index 8a97307fbbd6..4f41e321ea63 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_mlme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_mlme.c
> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ void r8712_joinbss_event_callback(struct _adapter *adapter, u8 *pbuf)
> struct sta_priv *pstapriv = &adapter->stapriv;
> struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv = &adapter->mlmepriv;
> struct wlan_network *cur_network = &pmlmepriv->cur_network;
> - struct wlan_network *pcur_wlan = NULL, *ptarget_wlan = NULL;
> + struct wlan_network *ptarget_wlan = NULL;
> unsigned int the_same_macaddr = false;
> struct wlan_network *pnetwork;
>
> @@ -721,13 +721,6 @@ void r8712_joinbss_event_callback(struct _adapter *adapter, u8 *pbuf)
> scanned_queue,
> cur_network->network.MacAddress);
> } else {
> - pcur_wlan =
> - r8712_find_network(&pmlmepriv->
> - scanned_queue,
> - cur_network->network.MacAddress);
> - if (pcur_wlan)
> - pcur_wlan->fixed = false;
> -
> pcur_sta = r8712_get_stainfo(pstapriv,
> cur_network->network.MacAddress);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&pstapriv->
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done
here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
