Re: [PATCH 1/2] ALSA: control - fix a leak in snd_ctl_led_init()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 02. 04. 21 v 13:42 Dan Carpenter napsal(a):
> This unwind loop needs to free snd_ctl_leds[0] as well.
> 
> Fixes: cb17fe0045aa ("ALSA: control - add sysfs support to the LED trigger module")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  sound/core/control_led.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/core/control_led.c b/sound/core/control_led.c
> index d4fb8b873f34..202b475d0bf3 100644
> --- a/sound/core/control_led.c
> +++ b/sound/core/control_led.c
> @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ static struct snd_ctl_layer_ops snd_ctl_led_lops = {
>  static int __init snd_ctl_led_init(void)
>  {
>  	struct snd_ctl_led *led;
> -	unsigned int group;
> +	int group;
>  
>  	device_initialize(&snd_ctl_led_dev);
>  	snd_ctl_led_dev.class = sound_class;
> @@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ static int __init snd_ctl_led_init(void)
>  		dev_set_name(&led->dev, led->name);
>  		if (device_add(&led->dev)) {
>  			put_device(&led->dev);
> -			for (; group > 0; group--) {
> +			for (; group >= 0; group--) {
>  				led = &snd_ctl_leds[group];

It's not correct. This assignent should be 'led = &snd_ctl_leds[group - 1];'
without other changes, because the put_device() is enough when device_add() fails.

Could you resend the correction?

					Jaroslav

>  				device_del(&led->dev);
>  			}
> 


-- 
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux