Re: [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Chen Lifu <chenlifu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:59:35 +0300
Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxx>, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, heying24@xxxxxxxxxx, yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx, weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx, johnny.chenyi@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210327095227.105081-1-chenlifu@huawei.com>
References: <20210327095227.105081-1-chenlifu@huawei.com>

* Chen Lifu <chenlifu@xxxxxxxxxx> [210327 11:53]:
> From: Lifu Chen <chenlifu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
> rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init().

Thanks applying into omap-for-v5.13/soc.

Tony

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
  - From: chenlifu

References:
- [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
  - From: Chen Lifu

Prev by Date: [PATCH -next] RDMA/iw_cxgb4: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
Next by Date: [PATCH -next] media: uvcvideo: Remove unused including <linux/version.h>
Previous by thread: [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux