On 3/18/21 9:16 AM, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The 3rd argument to alloc_workqueue should be the max_active count, > however currently it is the lo->lo_number that is intended for the > loop%d number. Fix this by adding in the missing max_active count. Dan, please fold this (or something similar) in when you're redoing the series. -- Jens Axboe
