On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:57:00 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Currently the check for failur on the call to clk_hw_get_parent
> is checking for a null return in the divider pointer instead of
> checking the mux pointer. Fix this.
>
> Thanks to Michael Tretter for suggesting the correct fix.
Thanks!
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically Dead Code")
> Fixes: 9c789deea206 ("soc: xilinx: vcu: implement clock provider for output clocks")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> V2: Check on mux pointer rather than removing deadcode that wasn't
> actually really dead code.
>
> ---
> drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
> index d66b1315114e..256b8c4b9ee4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static void xvcu_clk_hw_unregister_leaf(struct clk_hw *hw)
>
> mux = clk_hw_get_parent(divider);
> clk_hw_unregister_mux(mux);
The mux should be unregistered after the check
> - if (!divider)
> + if (!mux)
> return;
>
> clk_hw_unregister_divider(divider);
and the divider before the check.
Michael
