On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 1:48 AM Nigel Christian <nigel.l.christian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In the comment for trace in passive mode there is an > unnecessary "the". Eradicate it. > > Signed-off-by: Nigel Christian <nigel.l.christian@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > index 6f2ff2775664..5175ae3cac44 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > @@ -2498,7 +2498,7 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_verify_policy(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy) > * driver call was via the normal or fast switch path. Various graphs > * output from the intel_pstate_tracer.py utility that include core_busy > * (or performance or core_avg_perf) have a fixed y-axis from 0 to 100%, > - * so we use 10 to indicate the the normal path through the driver, and > + * so we use 10 to indicate the normal path through the driver, and > * 90 to indicate the fast switch path through the driver. > * The scaled_busy field is not used, and is set to 0. > */ > -- Applied as 5.12 material, thanks!
