Hi Dan,
Le 21/01/2021 à 07:10, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
If "ff->dev_lock_changed" has not changed
According to the "while (!ff->dev_lock_changed) { ... }" just above and
the lock in place, can this ever happen?
In other word, I wonder if the "if (ff->dev_lock_changed)" test makes
sense and if it could be removed.
(same for your other patch against sound/firewire/oxfw/oxfw-hwdep.c)
CJ
and "count" is too large then
this will copy data beyond the end of the struct to user space.
Fixes: f656edd5fb33 ("ALSA: fireface: add hwdep interface")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/firewire/fireface/ff-hwdep.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/firewire/fireface/ff-hwdep.c b/sound/firewire/fireface/ff-hwdep.c
index 4b2e0dff5ddb..b84dde609a03 100644
--- a/sound/firewire/fireface/ff-hwdep.c
+++ b/sound/firewire/fireface/ff-hwdep.c
@@ -35,12 +35,12 @@ static long hwdep_read(struct snd_hwdep *hwdep, char __user *buf, long count,
}
memset(&event, 0, sizeof(event));
+ count = min_t(long, count, sizeof(event.lock_status));
if (ff->dev_lock_changed) {
event.lock_status.type = SNDRV_FIREWIRE_EVENT_LOCK_STATUS;
event.lock_status.status = (ff->dev_lock_count > 0);
ff->dev_lock_changed = false;
- count = min_t(long, count, sizeof(event.lock_status));
}
spin_unlock_irq(&ff->lock);