Re: [PATCH] In the current implementation, should_check_rate() …

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Makus,
My apology for sending to the wrong mail list. Please ignore this
email. I'll reformat it and send it to the fio maillist.

Regards,
Hongwei

On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 2:10 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This patch addresses the issue by not checking td->bytes_done in should_check_rate.
>
> I suggest to improve the change description.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=1d94330a437a573cfdf848f6743b1ed169242c8a#n89
>
> Please choose a succinct patch subject.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=1d94330a437a573cfdf848f6743b1ed169242c8a#n569
>
>
> > +++ b/fio.h
>
> Do you refer to a header file from a special repository here?
> https://github.com/axboe/fio/blame/4008b7fc8e2bff60a4e98de0005e6bc71b1a8641/fio.h#L765
>
> Regards,
> Markus



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux