RE: [PATCH v2] drm/kmb: Fix possible oops in probe error handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Dan.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2020 11:48 PM
> To: Chrisanthus, Anitha <anitha.chrisanthus@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dea, Edmund J <edmund.j.dea@xxxxxxxxx>; David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>;
> Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>; Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; dri-
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/kmb: Fix possible oops in probe error handling
> 
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:15:57PM +0000, Chrisanthus, Anitha wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> > I see the problem now, thanks for the patch.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 12:11 AM
> > > To: Chrisanthus, Anitha <anitha.chrisanthus@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Dea, Edmund J <edmund.j.dea@xxxxxxxxx>; David Airlie
> <airlied@xxxxxxxx>;
> > > Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>; Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; dri-
> > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/kmb: Fix possible oops in probe error handling
> > >
> > > If kmb_dsi_init() fails the "kmb->kmb_dsi" variable is an error pointer.
> > > The kernel will Oops when we pass it to kmb_dsi_host_unregister().
> > >
> > > Fixes: 7f7b96a8a0a1 ("drm/kmb: Add support for KeemBay Display")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v2: write a better commit message
> > >
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c | 5 +++--
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c
> > > index a31a840ce634..8c43b136765c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/kmb/kmb_drv.c
> > > @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static int kmb_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > >  	if (IS_ERR(kmb->kmb_dsi)) {
> > >  		drm_err(&kmb->drm, "failed to initialize DSI\n");
> > >  		ret = PTR_ERR(kmb->kmb_dsi);
> > > -		goto err_free1;
> > > +		goto err_clear_drvdata;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	kmb->kmb_dsi->dev = &dsi_pdev->dev;
> > > @@ -540,8 +540,9 @@ static int kmb_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > >  	drm_crtc_cleanup(&kmb->crtc);
> > >  	drm_mode_config_cleanup(&kmb->drm);
> > >   err_free1:
> > > -	dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
> > >  	kmb_dsi_host_unregister(kmb->kmb_dsi);
> > > + err_clear_drvdata:
> > We still need to unregister the dsi_host that was registered in this call
> kmb_dsi_host_bridge_init.
> > This will require more changes in kmb_dsi_host_unregister and/or separate
> out mipi_dsi_host_unregister.
> > FYI - I will be out all of next week, will be back the next Monday.
> 
> Hm...  Yes.  Now that you point it out, there are several bugs related
> to kmb_dsi_host_bridge_init()...
> 
>    182  void kmb_dsi_host_unregister(struct kmb_dsi *kmb_dsi)
>    183  {
>    184          kmb_dsi_clk_disable(kmb_dsi);
>    185          mipi_dsi_host_unregister(kmb_dsi->host);
>                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> kmb_dsi->host is dsi_host.
> 
> Every user unregisters it, but only the first user registers it.  So
> if there are multiple users it will be unregistered prematurely.  Should
> there be a kfree to prevent a leak?
> 
> 		kfree(kmb_dsi->host);
> 		dsi_host = NULL;
> 
>    186  }
> 
> [ snip ]
> 
>    216  int kmb_dsi_host_bridge_init(struct device *dev)
>    217  {
>    218          struct device_node *encoder_node, *dsi_out;
>    219
>    220          /* Create and register MIPI DSI host */
>    221          if (!dsi_host) {
>                      ^^^^^^^^
> This is only allocated for the first user.
> 
>    222                  dsi_host = kzalloc(sizeof(*dsi_host), GFP_KERNEL);
>    223                  if (!dsi_host)
>    224                          return -ENOMEM;
>    225
>    226                  dsi_host->ops = &kmb_dsi_host_ops;
>    227
>    228                  if (!dsi_device) {
>    229                          dsi_device = kzalloc(sizeof(*dsi_device), GFP_KERNEL);
>    230                          if (!dsi_device) {
>    231                                  kfree(dsi_host);
>                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> But now it is non-NULL but it is a freed pointer.  dsi_host = NULL;
> 
>    232                                  return -ENOMEM;
>    233                          }
>    234                  }
>    235
>    236                  dsi_host->dev = dev;
>    237                  mipi_dsi_host_register(dsi_host);
>    238          }
>    239
> 
> [ snip ]
> 
>    482
>    483          of_node_put(dsi_in);
>    484          of_node_put(dsi_node);
>    485          ret = kmb_dsi_host_bridge_init(get_device(&dsi_pdev->dev));
>                                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This get_device() needs a matching put_device().  I kind of like to put
> the kref_get() calls on their own line so that they're more obvious to
> the reader.
> 
> 	get_device(&dsi_pdev->dev);
> 	kmb_dsi_host_bridge_init(&dsi_pdev->dev);
> 
>    486
>    487          if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>    488                  return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>    489          } else if (ret) {
>    490                  DRM_ERROR("probe failed to initialize DSI host bridge\n");
>    491                  return ret;
>    492          }
>    493
>    494          /* Create DRM device */
>    495          kmb = devm_drm_dev_alloc(dev, &kmb_driver,
>    496                                   struct kmb_drm_private, drm);
>    497          if (IS_ERR(kmb))
>    498                  return PTR_ERR(kmb);
> 
> On these error paths we would want to unwind using a call to
> kmb_dsi_host_unregister().
> 
>    499
>    500          dev_set_drvdata(dev, &kmb->drm);
>    501
>    502          /* Initialize MIPI DSI */
>    503          kmb->kmb_dsi = kmb_dsi_init(dsi_pdev);
>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This is the call where the "kmb_dsi->host = dsi_host;" assignment
> actually happens.
> 
>    504          if (IS_ERR(kmb->kmb_dsi)) {
>    505                  drm_err(&kmb->drm, "failed to initialize DSI\n");
>    506                  ret = PTR_ERR(kmb->kmb_dsi);
>    507                  goto err_free1;
>    508          }
>    509
>    510          kmb->kmb_dsi->dev = &dsi_pdev->dev;
>    511          kmb->kmb_dsi->pdev = dsi_pdev;
>    512          ret = kmb_hw_init(&kmb->drm, 0);
> 
> It feels like it would be a lot easier if the kmb_dsi_init() and
> kmb_dsi_host_bridge_init() functions were combined.  Probably the
> dsi_host and dsi_device stuff needs to be refcounted?
> 
> Anyway, I can't test this stuff and I'm not really familiar with the
> driver.  Could you fix it and CC me on the fix?
I will work on the fix later and will CC you, very busy with other stuff right now.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux