On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 14:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > > > > > > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not. > > > > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the > > > > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the > > > > patch. > > > > > > > > > > The patch showed up in the archives within seconds: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated. > > > > Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came from. > > There's also linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > that is listed as moderated > > Are any of the vger lists actually moderated? > Joe, I found these five list entries with inconsistent remarks: - linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx/ (the patch here) - linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912183334.22683-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx/ - linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx/ - initial patch here was wrong. - waiting for somebody to confirm that it is not moderated to then send the correct patch. - linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914061353.17535-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx/ - linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: - by 'majority vote' (131 vs. 27), it is probably moderated. - no patch sent yet; patch will follow once the others are accepted. Then, more patches on adding 'exploders for non-subscribers' remarks will follow. Lukas
