Re: [PATCH] nvmet-fc: Fix a missed _irqsave version of spin_lock in 'nvmet_fc_fod_op_done()'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The way 'spin_lock()' and 'spin_lock_irqsave()' are used is not consistent
in this function.

Use 'spin_lock_irqsave()' also here, as there is no guarantee that
interruptions are disabled at that point, according to surrounding code.

Fixes: a97ec51b37ef ("nvmet_fc: Rework target side abort handling")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Not tested, only based on what looks logical to me according to
surrounding code
---
  drivers/nvme/target/fc.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
index 55bafd56166a..e6861cc10e7d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
@@ -2342,9 +2342,9 @@ nvmet_fc_fod_op_done(struct nvmet_fc_fcp_iod *fod)
  			return;
  		if (fcpreq->fcp_error ||
  		    fcpreq->transferred_length != fcpreq->transfer_length) {
-			spin_lock(&fod->flock);
+			spin_lock_irqsave(&fod->flock, flags);
  			fod->abort = true;
-			spin_unlock(&fod->flock);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fod->flock, flags);
nvmet_req_complete(&fod->req, NVME_SC_INTERNAL);
  			return;


James, can I get a reviewed-by from you on this?



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux