On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > > > > > > When of_property_read_u32_array() returns an error code, > > > > a pairing refcount decrement is needed to keep np's refcount balanced. > > > > > > Can another imperative wording be helpful for the change description? > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=18445bf405cb331117bc98427b1ba6f12418ad17#n151 > > > > > > Would an other commit message be a bit nicer? > > > > > > > > > … > > > > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/sky81452-backlight.c > > > > @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ static struct sky81452_bl_platform_data *sky81452_bl_parse_dt( > > > > num_entry); > > > > if (ret < 0) { > > > > dev_err(dev, "led-sources node is invalid.\n"); > > > > + of_node_put(np); > > > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > > > } > > > > > > I propose to add the jump target “put_node” so that a bit of common exception > > > handling code can be better reused at the end of this function implementation. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Markus > > > > You can safely ignore any review comments from Markus! > > > > However, this patch doesn't appear to be in my inbox. > > > > Any ideas as to why? > > > > Thank you for your advice. My outbox shows that this patch > has reached your email server successfully. Maybe this > ended up in your junk mail file? This has happened recently, so I was sure to check. Not there either unfortunately. Would you be kind enough to bounce/resend please? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
