From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The 64 bit ino is being compared to the product of two u32
values, however, the multiplication is being performed using
a 32 bit multiply so there is a potential of an overflow. To
be fully safe, cast uspi->s_ncg to a u64 to ensure a 64 bit
multiplication occurs to avoid any chance of overflow.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: f3e2a520f5fb ("ufs: NFS support")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ufs/super.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ufs/super.c b/fs/ufs/super.c
index 1da0be667409..e3b69fb280e8 100644
--- a/fs/ufs/super.c
+++ b/fs/ufs/super.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static struct inode *ufs_nfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, u64 ino, u32 gene
struct ufs_sb_private_info *uspi = UFS_SB(sb)->s_uspi;
struct inode *inode;
- if (ino < UFS_ROOTINO || ino > uspi->s_ncg * uspi->s_ipg)
+ if (ino < UFS_ROOTINO || ino > (u64)uspi->s_ncg * uspi->s_ipg)
return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
inode = ufs_iget(sb, ino);
--
2.27.0
