Hi,
Le sam. 4 juil. 2020 à 8:32, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:59:01PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The variable i is being initialized with a value that is
never read and it is being updated later with a new value. The
initialization is redundant and can be removed.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
What about 'ret'? Doesn't the same reasoning apply for it?
That's correct.
Colin, could you respin the patch and do the same for the 'ret'
variable?
Thanks,
-Paul
