>> Do you find a previous update suggestion useful? >> >> ARM: imx6: Add missing put_device() call in imx6q_suspend_init() >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/5acd7308-f6e1-4b1e-c744-bb2e5fdca1be@xxxxxx/ >> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1151158/ >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/9/125 … > It is useful indeed. Thanks for your positive feedback. > Although I didn't run cocci script, since it can produce too many false result > which is hard to filter out. Would you like to clarify any corresponding software analysis options? > BTW, I see you haver done the work already, I guess I won't send any patches > related to 'missing put_device after of_find_device_by_node()'. You may continue also with contributions in such a direction. I would like to point out that other developers occasionally got into the mood to improve implementation details in similar ways already. > Any idea why these pathes didn't get applied ? I can make assumptions about the reasons for the possibly questionable handling of such patches. Regards, Markus
