> Calling pm_runtime_get_sync increments the counter even in case of > failure, causing incorrect ref count. Call pm_runtime_put if > pm_runtime_get_sync fails. Is it appropriate to copy a sentence from the change description into the patch subject? How do you think about a wording variant like the following? The PM runtime reference counter is generally incremented by a call of the function “pm_runtime_get_sync”. Thus call the function “pm_runtime_put” also in two error cases to keep the reference counting consistent. Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message? Regards, Markus
