Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sirf: Add missing put_device() call in sirfsoc_gpio_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> in sirfsoc_gpio_probe(), if of_find_device_by_node() succeed,
> put_device() is missing in the error handling patch.

How do you think about another wording variant?

   A coccicheck run provided information like the following.

   drivers/pinctrl/sirf/pinctrl-sirf.c:798:2-8: ERROR: missing put_device;
   call of_find_device_by_node on line 792, but without a corresponding
   object release within this function.

   Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci

   Thus add a jump target to fix the exception handling for this
   function implementation.


Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?

Regards,
Markus




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux