Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:02:11 +0200
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@xxxxxxx>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@xxxxxxx>, Stephen McCamant <smccaman@xxxxxxx>, Qiushi Wu <wu000273@xxxxxxx>, Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200602094947.GA5684@sirena.org.uk>
References: <26028f50-3fb8-eb08-3c9f-08ada018bf9e@web.de> <20200602094947.GA5684@sirena.org.uk>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1

> The original changelog is perfectly fine, please stop sending these.

I find this commit message improvable also according to Linux software
development documentation.

Regards,
Markus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
  - From: Mark Brown

References:
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
  - From: Markus Elfring
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
  - From: Mark Brown

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: freescale: imx: Fix an error handling path in 'imx_pinctrl_probe()'
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]