Hi Colin... thanks for the patch, I have applied it
to the orangefs for-next tree...
-Mike
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 6:48 PM Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The variable ret is being initialized with a value that is
> never read and it is being updated later with a new value. The
> initialization is redundant and can be removed.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c b/fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c
> index c010c1fddafc..289b648ae196 100644
> --- a/fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c
> +++ b/fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(orangefs_request_list_waitq);
>
> static int __init orangefs_init(void)
> {
> - int ret = -1;
> + int ret;
> __u32 i = 0;
>
> if (op_timeout_secs < 0)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
