Re: [PATCH] rtc: mc13xxx: fix a double-unlock issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> … To fix this problem,
> we need to call mc13xxx_lock() again in this error path.

How do you think about a wording variant like the following?

   Change description:
   …
   Thus add a call of the function “mc13xxx_lock” in an if branch
   for the completion of the exception handling.


Would you like to add the tag “Fixes”?

Regards,
Markus




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux