> The of_drm_find_bridge() function returns NULL on error, it doesn't return > error pointers so this check doesn't work. How do you think about a wording variant like the following? Change description: An error pointer check was performed after a call of the function “of_drm_find_bridge” despite of the detail that failures are indicated for the bridge search by null pointers instead. Thus adjust a check for the failure predicate and the corresponding exception handling. Regards, Markus
