Re: [PATCH][next] drm/amdgpu: fix unlocks on error return path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:56 AM Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Currently the error returns paths are unlocking lock kiq->ring_lock
> however it seems this should be dev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock as this
> is the lock that is being locked and unlocked around the ring
> operations.  This looks like a bug, fix it by unlocking the
> correct lock.
>
> [ Note: untested ]
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Missing unlock")
> Fixes: 82478876eaac ("drm/amdgpu: protect ring overrun")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

It's the same lock, just accessed via a local pointer.  I'll take the
patch and update the commit message when I apply it to avoid confusion
in the future.

Alex

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c  | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> index b120f9160f13..edaa50d850a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static int gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>                 r = amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
>                 if (r) {
>                         amdgpu_ring_undo(ring);
> -                       spin_unlock(&kiq->ring_lock);
> +                       spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
>                         return -ETIME;
>                 }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> index 0a6026308343..055ecba754ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>                 r = amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
>                 if (r) {
>                         amdgpu_ring_undo(ring);
> -                       spin_unlock(&kiq->ring_lock);
> +                       spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
>                         return -ETIME;
>                 }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux