Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Avoid double lock for cp_rwsem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Call stack :
> f2fs_write_checkpoint()
> -> block_operations(sbi)
…

Will another imperative wording become helpful besides the provided information
for this change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=c578ddb39e565139897124e74e5a43e56538cb33#n151

How do you think about to add the tag “Fixes” because of adjustments
for the data synchronisation?

Regards,
Markus




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux