On 03/04/2020 10:22, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 03/04/2020 11:45:04+0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:53:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >>> >>> As stated, I also prefer keeping the watchdog optional and ignore the >>> error. >> >> Hopefully you aren't running out of memory on start up. In current >> kernels small memory allocations like this never fail so it doesn't >> really affect runtime. It only silences the NULL dereference static >> checker warning. >> > > Yes, so the > > if (!wdt) > return; > > would be enough instead of introducing unnecessary error handling. > OK, I'll send a V3 later today.
