On Wed, 4 Mar 2020, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 21:50 +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:29:50 +0100 > > > Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Jonathan, pick pick this patch for doc-next. > > > > > > Sigh, I need to work a MAINTAINERS check into my workflow... > > > > > > > I getting closer to have zero warnings on the MAINTAINER file matches and > > then, I would set up a bot following the mailing lists to warn when anyone > > sends a patch that potentially introduces such warning. > > Hey Lukas. > > I wrote a hacky script that sent emails > for invalid MAINTAINER F: and X: patterns > a couple years back. > > I ran it in September 2018 and March 2019. > > It's attached if you want to play with it. > The email sending bit is commented out. > > The script is used like: > > $ perl ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns | \ > cut -f2 -d: | \ > while read line ; do \ > perl ./dump_section.perl $line \ > done > Thanks, Joe. That is certainly helpful, I will try to make use of it in the future; fortunately, there really not too many invalid F: patterns left, and I can send the last few patches out myself. Lukas
