On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 21:34 +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 17:03 +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > > Commit 47f9c2796891 ("KEYS: trusted: Create trusted keys
> > > > subsystem")
> > > > renamed trusted.h to trusted_tpm.h in include/keys/, and moved
> > > > trusted.c
> > > > to trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c in security/keys/.
> > > >
> > > > Since then, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test complains:
> > > >
> > > > warning: no file matches F: security/keys/trusted.c
> > > > warning: no file matches F: include/keys/trusted.h
> > > >
> > > > Rectify the KEYS-TRUSTED entry in MAINTAINERS now.
> > > >
> > > > Co-developed-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@xxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Duda <sebastian.duda@xxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > Sumit, please ack.
> > > > Jarkko, please pick this patch.
> > >
> > > I'll pick it when it is done. I acknowledge the regression but I
> > > see no reason for rushing as this does not break any systems in
> > > the wild.
> > >
> >
> > Agree. No need to rush this. I sent out a v3, and I hope to get
> > Sumit's ACK and then you can pick it for the next merge window.
>
> From a process point of view, I don't quite understand this. You're
> altering an entry in the MAINTAINERS file which belongs to the three
> maintainers of trusted keys, you only need our ack to do that, which
> picking up via the trusted key tree will substitute for. It would be
> useful to have Sumit review this because he moved the files and there
> may be something we missed, but a reviewed-by: is a nice to have and
> not a block on the process.
>
Agree. I expect Sumit to acknowledge that the PATCH v3 "fixes" what he
missed in his commit from his point of view. I do not use the Fixes: tag,
because it just some basic administrative clean-up, but not any
functional change; commits with Fixes: tags are quickly picked up for
stable, but this patch should not be picked up, because changes to
MAINTAINERS do not need to be reflected in stable branches.
There is no rush and no blocker here.
Lukas
