On 27/02/2020 11:46, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 07:58:26PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> In the unlikely event that num_entry is zero, the while loop
>> pre-decrements num_entry to cause negative array indexing into the
>> array sources. Fix this by iterating only if num_entry >= 0.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Out-of-bounds read")
>> Fixes: f705806c9f35 ("backlight: Add support Skyworks SKY81452 backlight driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> V2: fix typo in commit subject line
>
> Isn't the correct spelling "ensure"?
It is. V1 is correct after all. Doh.
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/video/backlight/sky81452-backlight.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/sky81452-backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/sky81452-backlight.c
>> index 2355f00f5773..f456930ce78e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/sky81452-backlight.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/sky81452-backlight.c
>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static struct sky81452_bl_platform_data *sky81452_bl_parse_dt(
>> }
>>
>> pdata->enable = 0;
>> - while (--num_entry)
>> + while (--num_entry >= 0)
>> pdata->enable |= (1 << sources[num_entry]);
>
> This look still looks buggy to me (so I'd second Walter's request to
> change it to a for loop). If the code genuinely does not contain a
> bug then it probably needs a prominent comment explaining why it is
> correct not to honour sources[0]!
>
>
> Daniel.
>
