Yes, thank you!
On 2020/2/22 22:24, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Pointer ctx is being re-assigned with the same value as it
was initialized with. The second assignment is redundant and
can be removed.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c
index a2cfcc9ccd94..acd15507eb8a 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c
@@ -447,7 +447,6 @@ static int sec_skcipher_init(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm)
struct sec_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
int ret;
- ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
ctx->alg_type = SEC_SKCIPHER;
crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(tfm, sizeof(struct sec_req));
ctx->c_ctx.ivsize = crypto_skcipher_ivsize(tfm);
