On 2/11/20 9:02 AM, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Currently variable ret is not initialized and this value is being > returned at the end of the function io_poll_double_wake. Since > ret is not being used anywhere else remove it and just return 0. It's supposed to return 1, a previous edition had 'ret' dependent on the wake call, but we didn't need that anymore. I folded in a fix earlier this morning, and my for-next branch should now be fine. -- Jens Axboe
