Re: [PATCH] btrfs: tests: Fix an NULL vs IS_ERR() test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: tests: Fix an NULL vs IS_ERR() test
From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:55:32 +0100
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200117053432.k46ftoqf67dezauh@kili.mountain>
Mail-followup-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20200117053432.k46ftoqf67dezauh@kili.mountain>
Reply-to: dsterba@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:34:32AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The btrfs_alloc_dummy_device() function never returns NULL, it returns
> error pointers.
> 
> Fixes: 5d9a4f871168 ("btrfs: Add self-tests for btrfs_rmap_block")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, folded to the original patch.

References:
- [PATCH] btrfs: tests: Fix an NULL vs IS_ERR() test
  - From: Dan Carpenter

Prev by Date: [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: fix for-loop with incorrectly sized loop counter
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: fix for-loop with incorrectly sized loop counter
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: tests: Fix an NULL vs IS_ERR() test
Next by thread: [PATCH][next] crypto: hisilicon: fix spelling mistake "disgest" -> "digest"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]