Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: bma400: integer underflow setting accel scale

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for taking a look at the code and your feedback on the driver!

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 08:45:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We put an upper bound on "val2" but we also need to prevent negative
> values.

"val" is not used past the invalid value check. We only use "val" to make sure
that it is in fact 0. AFAIK there is no "upper bound" on "val", it should be
zero or we return -EINVAL. Am I missing something?

Cheers,

 - Dan




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux