> - fix 'WARNING:' twice in each case. A duplicate text was removed. > +@script:python depends on org@ > +p << r.p; > +ul << r.ul; I interpret this variable assignment in the way that it will work only if the corresponding branch of the SmPL disjunction was actually matched by the referenced SmPL rule. Thus I suggest now to split the source code search pattern into four separate rules. > +warnings = construct_warnings(ul, "div64_ul") * Can two identifiers be nicer without an “s”? * Would it be sufficient to pass a shorter identification (without the prefix “div64_”)? Regards, Markus
