>>> +( >>> +* do_div(f, l); >>> +| >>> +* do_div(f, ul); >>> +| >>> +* do_div(f, ul64); >>> +| >>> +* do_div(f, sl64); >>> +) >> >> I suggest to avoid the specification of duplicate SmPL code. >> >> +@@ >> +*do_div(f, \( l \| ul \| ul64 \| sl64 \) ); > > I don't se any point to this. Can such succinct SmPL code be occasionally desirable? > The original code is quite readable, Yes. - I dare to present a coding style alternative. > without the ugly \( etc. I wonder about this view. >> Please improve the message construction. > > Please make more precise comments (I already made some suggestions, Thus I omitted a repetition. > so it doesn't matter much here, but "please improve" does not provide any > concrete guidance). I guess that Wen Yang can know corresponding software design possibilities from previous development discussions. Regards, Markus
