Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Unlock on a couple error paths

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Unlock on a couple error paths
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 22:04:52 -0500
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>, Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Can Guo <cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20191213104828.7i64cpoof26rc4fw@kili.mountain> (Dan Carpenter's message of "Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:48:28 +0300")
Organization: Oracle Corporation
References: <20191213104828.7i64cpoof26rc4fw@kili.mountain>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.92 (gnu/linux)

Dan,

> We introduced a few new error paths, but we can't return directly, we
> first have to unlock "hba->clk_scaling_lock" first.

Applied #1 + #2 to 5.6/scsi-queue. Thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Unlock on a couple error paths
  - From: Dan Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: mpt3sas: Fix double free in attach error handling
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix some typo in some warning messages
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Unlock on a couple error paths
Next by thread: [PATCH] ath11k: checking for NULL vs IS_ERR()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]