Re: [PATCH] Silence an uninitialized variable warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 09:42:47PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> > The current code has this:
> > 
> > static int __init syscall_enter_define_fields(struct trace_event_call *call)
> > {
> > 	struct syscall_trace_enter trace;
> > 	struct syscall_metadata *meta = call->data;
> > 	int ret;
> > 	int i;
> > 	int offset = offsetof(typeof(trace), args);
> > 
> > 	ret = trace_define_field(call, SYSCALL_FIELD(int, nr, __syscall_nr),
> > 				 FILTER_OTHER);
> 
> In linux-next this ret = trace_define_field() assignment is removed.
> That was commit 60fdad00827c ("ftrace: Rework event_create_dir()").

Yep, mea culpa.

> > 	if (ret)
> > 		return ret;
> > 
> > 	for (i = 0; i < meta->nb_args; i++) {
> > 		ret = trace_define_field(call, meta->types[i],
> > 					 meta->args[i], offset,
> > 					 sizeof(unsigned long), 0,
> > 					 FILTER_OTHER);
> > 		offset += sizeof(unsigned long);
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	return ret;
> > }
> > 
> > 
> > How can ret possibly be uninitialized?
> 
> I should have written this commit more carefully and verified whether
> meta->nb_args can actually be zero instead of just assuming it was a
> false positive...

Right, I'm thinking this is in fact possible. We have syscalls without
arguments (sys_sched_yield for exmaple).



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux