On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 09:30:58AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 09:05:06AM +0800, Mao Wenan wrote:
> > There is no need to have the 'T *v' variable static
> > since new value always be assigned before use it.
> >
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/power/supply/ab8500_btemp.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/ab8500_btemp.c b/drivers/power/supply/ab8500_btemp.c
> > index 909f0242bacb..d3d4f7327d1b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/power/supply/ab8500_btemp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/ab8500_btemp.c
> > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int ab8500_btemp_batctrl_volt_to_res(struct ab8500_btemp *di,
> > static int ab8500_btemp_read_batctrl_voltage(struct ab8500_btemp *di)
> > {
> > int vbtemp, ret;
> > - static int prev;
> > + int prev;
>
> No. We use it first on linux-next (yesterday). It needs to be static.
>
It's surprising that your patch didn't cause an uninitialized variable
compile warning for you.
regards,
dan carpenter
