Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:28:32PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:58:54PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> >> Mao Wenan <maowenan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>> >> >
>> >> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c: In function kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request_mask:
>> >> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:7911:7: warning: variable called set but not
>> >> > used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>> >> >
>> >> > It is not used since commit 7ee30bc132c6 ("KVM: x86: deliver KVM
>> >> > IOAPIC scan request to target vCPUs")
>> >>
>> >> Better expressed as
>> >>
>> >> Fixes: 7ee30bc132c6 ("KVM: x86: deliver KVM IOAPIC scan request to target vCPUs")
>> >>
>> >
>> > There is sort of a debate about this whether the Fixes tag should be
>> > used if it's only a cleanup.
>> >
>>
>> I have to admit I'm involved in doing backporting sometimes and I really
>> appreciate Fixes: tags. Just so you know on which side of the debate I
>> am :-)
>
> But we're not going to backport this hopefully?
>
In case we're speaking about stable@ kernels, 7ee30bc132c6 doesn't look
like a good candidate (to me) but who knows, it may get pulled in
because of some code dependency or some other 'autosel magic'. And
that's when 'Fixes:' tags become handy.
--
Vitaly
