> …, an a random previous Does this wording contain a typo? > We plan to treat this version as the future upstream for the code base > once merged, and all new features and bug fixes will go upstream first. Were the following mentioned issues occasionally reviewed already by other developers before? > v3: > - fix wrong sbi->s_dirt set. > > v2: > - Check the bitmap count up to the total clusters. > - Rename proper goto labels in seveal place. Would you like to avoid further typos in such change descriptions? > - Change time mode type with enumeration. How do you think about to increase the usage of enumerations at any more source code places? > - Directly return error instead of goto at first error check. > - Combine seq_printfs calls into a single one. Please refer to the correct function name. Thanks for your positive feedback. Regards, Markus
