>>> In the old code (e.g.) mutex_destroy() was called before >>> pwmchip_remove(). Between these two calls it is possible that a pwm >>> callback is used which tries to grab the mutex. >> >> How do you think about to add a more “imperative mood” for your >> change description? >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=31f4f5b495a62c9a8b15b1c3581acd5efeb9af8c#n151 > > I described the old behaviour and like my wording. I find that the first paragraph contains useful information. Would you like to specify any corresponding actions then at this place? Regards, Markus
