Re: [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in __drbd_send_protocol()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>, Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in __drbd_send_protocol()
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:26:39 -0800
Cc: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20191107074847.GA11695@mwanda>
References: <20191107074847.GA11695@mwanda>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 11/6/19 11:48 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:

There are two callers of this function and they both unlock the mutex so
this ends up being a double unlock.


Is there a typo in the patch subject (stay -> stray)?

Thanks,

Bart.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in __drbd_send_protocol()
  - From: Jens Axboe

References:
- [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in __drbd_send_protocol()
  - From: Dan Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove a stray tab in xfs_remount_rw()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in __drbd_send_protocol()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in __drbd_send_protocol()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] block: drbd: remove a stay unlock in __drbd_send_protocol()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Announce] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Networking Development] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux