>> Reuse existing functionality from memdup_user() instead of keeping
>> duplicate source code.
>>
>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/memdup_user.cocci
…
>> Fixes: f2bbc96e7cfad3891b7bf9bd3e566b9b7ab4553d ("s390/pkey: add CCA AES cipher key support")
>
> This doesn't fix anything
How would you categorise the proposed source code reduction and software reuse?
> and the Fixes: line is not appropriate.
Will the development opinions vary between contributors?
>> + return !ukey || keylen < MINKEYBLOBSIZE || keylen > KEYBLOBBUFSIZE
>> + ? ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)
>> + : memdup_user(ukey, keylen);
>
> This is a very poor use of ternary ?: code.
The conditional operator is applied once more in the intended way,
isn't it?
> This is much more readable for humans.
Readability preferences can vary also for this code structure.
>> + return uapqns && nr_apqns > 0
>> + ? memdup_user(uapqns, nr_apqns * sizeof(struct pkey_apqn))
>> + : NULL;
>
> And here you reverse the form of the earlier block.
I kept the previous condition specification.
> Please be consistent and use this style:
Would further developers like to get a more verbose variant for this
software transformation?
Regards,
Markus
