On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:10 AM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 22/10/2019 13:49, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Currently a multiply operation is being performed on two int values
> > and the result is being assigned to a u64, presumably because the
> > end result is expected to be probably larger than an int. However,
> > because the multiply is an int multiply one can get overflow. Avoid
> > the overflow by casting degc to a u64 to force a u64 multiply.
> >
> > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
> > Fixes: fbfe1a042cfd ("drivers: thermal: tsens: Add interrupt support")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > index 03bf1b8133ea..3d7855106ecd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ void compute_intercept_slope(struct tsens_priv *priv, u32 *p1,
> >
> > static inline u32 degc_to_code(int degc, const struct tsens_sensor *s)
> > {
> > - u64 code = (degc * s->slope + s->offset) / SLOPE_FACTOR;
> > + u64 code = ((u64)degc * s->slope + s->offset) / SLOPE_FACTOR;
>
>
> - u64 code = ((u64)degc * s->slope + s->offset) / SLOPE_FACTOR;
> + u64 code = div_u64(((u64)degc * s->slope + s->offset),
> SLOPE_FACTOR);
This implementation should handle 32-bit architectures too. Colin,
could you respin?
Regards,
Amit
